The January employment report released on Friday displays a labor market that, while cooling, continues to show robust job creation against a backdrop of mixed indicatorsAlthough the addition of only 143,000 non-farm jobs fell short of market expectations, previous months’ figures were significantly revised upwards, indicating ongoing resilience in the employment sector.

Specifically, the report noted a downward tick in the unemployment rate to 4.0%, down from 4.1% in December, counter to expectations of stability in the figureAverage hourly earnings increased by 4.1% year-on-year, although this was slightly below expectations as growth rates appeared to decelerate—from 3.9% in December to a forecast of 3.8%. On a month-to-month basis, wages saw a modest increase of 0.5%, marking an acceleration from December’s 0.3% growthMoreover, the labor force participation rate climbed to 62.6%, up from 62.5% in December.

In a broader context, the annual revisions revealed a significant downward adjustment of 589,000 jobs over the twelve months leading to March 2024. This marks a slight decrease from earlier projections, which anticipated a decline of 818,000 jobs—the largest drop since 2009. The average monthly job gain over the past year was revised to 166,000, down from an earlier estimate of 185,000.

Wall Street analysts interpret these findings as signs of a labor market that, while experiencing a slowdown in job growth at the start of the year, remains in line with the Federal Reserve’s assessments

Advertisements

This stability suggests that there may be little motivation for the Fed to embark on cuts to interest rates in the near futureAs uncertainties surrounding U.Spolicy continue to loom, there appears to be a likelihood that the Fed will refrain from making any immediate changes.

According to Capital Economics, the less-than-robust job creation figures shouldn't raise alarms, especially given the upward revisions in employment numbers from November and DecemberThey argue that this overall strengthening of employment figures, combined with the slight decrease in unemployment, provides enough rationale for the Fed to maintain a wait-and-see approach rather than hastily cutting rates.

Ellen Zentner, Chief Economic Strategist at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, echoed these sentimentsShe emphasized that the upward revisions from prior months, coupled with the drop in the jobless rate, effectively countered the impact of January's disappointing job numbers

Advertisements

"Those hoping for a weak report to spur the Fed to react were likely disappointed," Zentner remarked, underscoring the resilience of the labor market.

Similarly, Seema Shah, Global Strategist at Principal Asset Management, suggested that the current non-farm payroll report diminishes the likelihood of a March rate cut from the Federal ReserveShe highlighted that aside from the somewhat disappointing job growth figures, the overall conditions still depict a resilient labor market with persistent upward pressure on wages, compelling the Fed to maintain current rate levels.

Stephen Stanley, Chief U.SEconomist at Santander US Capital Markets, stated that the stability and health of the labor market indicated by this report suggest there would be no immediate justification for the Fed to consider further rate cuts.

Samuel Tombs, Chief U.SEconomist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, noted that while adjustments were made, the new non-farm payroll figures reveal a more stable employment market compared to previous months

Advertisements

Even though last year’s job creation came in lower than Pantheon’s past projections, this trend does not seem to be worsening, leading them to no longer expect a rate cut in March.

Paresh Upadhyaya, Head of Fixed Income and Currency Strategy at Amundi US Inc., asserted that this report certainly dispels market expectations surrounding a potential March rate cut, emphasizing that the Fed now appears to be in a holding pattern on rate adjustmentsHe noted that due to ongoing policy uncertainties, this pause could be indefinite.

Lindsay Rosner, Head of Multi-Sector Fixed Income Investment at Goldman Sachs Asset Management, noted that January’s employment report was a "mixed bag." With overall job growth appearing weak in January, tempered by high revisions from prior months, Rosner suggested that the Fed might adopt a cautious approach, avoiding overinterpretation of the current report.

Bloomberg economist Anna Wong highlighted that the unexpectedly weak January employment figures indicate that the labor market has become a significant source of downward inflationary pressure within the U.S

• Positive Trends in the Industrial Economy
• Divergent Trends Among Major U.S. Stock Indices
• DeepSeek: Transforming the Future of AI
• France's Persistent Sectoral Divides
• Dow Jumps Over 400 Points Down

economyShe noted that the institution’s revisions signaled a much lower expected employment level toward the end of 2024, compared to real-time data, while substantial upward adjustments in household surveys indicated a significantly larger labor supply than previously estimatedWong maintained her forecast of a 75 basis point rate cut from the Fed this year.

As policymakers assess the future of the labor market, attention has turned to the influence of U.Sgovernment policies, particularly concerning immigration and tariffsAnalysts suggest that any measures imposing restrictions on immigration or deportations could stifle the critical drivers of job growth seen in recent years.

According to analysts at JPMorgan, slowing immigration could soon impact wage growth, potentially evident in February's employment reportAlongside immigration policy, tariffs also introduce another layer of uncertainty into the U.S